Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec for progress element either specifies attribute order dependency or can be easily misread that way #3066

Closed
bzbarsky opened this issue Sep 25, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels
interop Implementations are not interoperable with each other

Comments

@bzbarsky
Copy link
Contributor

See w3c/html#1024 for details. Note that Edge ended up with behavior different from other browsers here, which indicates a spec issue to me.

@annevk annevk added the interop Implementations are not interoperable with each other label Sep 25, 2017
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 25, 2017

Sounds similar to #2427.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 25, 2017

Credit goes to Jinjiang (勾三股四).

@bzbarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, #2427 is similar conceptually. In both cases, imo, we should just not have hysteresis if we can avoid it.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 25, 2017

I guess I'll write some tests as well since it doesn't seem we have any that cover this.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 25, 2017

Tests are at web-platform-tests/wpt#7472. Fix for the HTML Standard at #3067.

Edge bug: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/13929346/.

@Jinjiang since you raised this (albeit against the fork of the HTML Standard) you might want to review this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
interop Implementations are not interoperable with each other
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants